Says Rabbi Dani Rapp in his 13 Ikarim (Maimonides’ 13 Principles of Faith) series on www.YUTorah.org, he believes those parts of the Orthodox world that outright deny science behind creation such as 13 billion years and big bang, dinosaurs and the like, should reconsider at least broaching the topics. Because when their kids get out into the working world, they will otherwise be totally unprepared when they are confronted with questions on these topics, and their non-Jewish colleagues will not have a favourable view of Jews – one will have confirmed their suspicions that Jews are ‘weird and different and insular and impossible to relate to’, and pretty much in Rabbi Rapp’s words (in jest) “you may as well just sprout horns then and there”, evoking just one of the medieval misconceptions spread via illiterate, antisemitic peasant folk in feudal Europe (many of which have survived to this day).
I look at it the other way as well - that a child unprepared for these questions, as the outside world presses further in, (via internet, etc), the child or young adult is more likely to be seduced by the entire mindset of the college professor (thinking to themselves, ‘well if you can question creation, then you question and indeed reject everything else – and what an easier life that appears to be’). They need to wait to Philosophy 2 to learn about the slippery-slope fallacy. But they often don’t, or don’t understand its importance, and go OTD (Off The Derech, or fry out, or reject their halachic strictures) very quickly – as the study below indicates.
There is no substitute for a steady yet gentle revelation of the ways and ideas of the outside world by parents and educators. Let the parents inoculate the fertile minds of the young with real-world, useful knowledge such as the slippery-slope argument (each lesson of course according to the child’s age). The reason behind the sky’s blueness can wait. And more and more, it must.
You don’t send a soldier out to battle armed with a teaspoon and a brown paper bag.
Survey: Religious Jews twice as likely to fall in religiosity as members of other faiths
Oct. 20, 2009
MATTHEW WAGNER and JACOB KANTER , THE JERUSALEM POST
The proportion of religious Jews reporting a fall in religiosity over the past five years was double that of people of other faiths, an international survey conducted in August and September reports.
The survey was commissioned by the Elijah Interfaith Institute from a US-based pollster for an international conference of religious leaders gathering this week in Haifa that is focused on religious leadership.
Poll respondents were men and women from the major faiths – Judaism,
Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism – who defined themselves as religious.
They were from all over the globe including Africa, North and South America, Europe and Asia. Jewish respondents were primarily from North America and Israel. The survey did not include haredim.
Respondents were asked if they have become more religious over the past five years, or less.
Among Jewish respondents 13 percent said they had become less religious, twice the proportion of any other faith.
Less than half of the Jewish respondents (39%) said they had become more religious, compared to 57% to 86% from other religions.
Among Jews, 65% said they believed Jewish leadership was important to their religion, compared to 86% among Christians and 79% among Muslims.
Only 34% of Jews said they had a national religious leader.
Only 59% of Jews who strongly identified as religious said they had a local
leader. For those who did have a local leader, 84% had trust in their leader.
Regarding satisfaction from leadership, Jews occupied the lowest place with 53% satisfaction with national and international leaders, compared with 66% among Christians and and 83% among Muslims.
Similarly, in relation to local leaders, the degree of satisfaction among Jews was 69%, compared to Christians and Muslims at 75%.
Only 71% of Jews found their local leader’s message relevant.
Jews had the lowest level of willingness to forgive their leaders and expectations of Jewish leadership fell much below expectations of leaders of other religions.
The indications of low expectations repeated themselves. Both on the local and the international level, Jews had the lowest expectations from their religious leaders for involvement in peace work, social work, ecological work and interfaith dialogue.
When asked about the appropriateness of the involvement of Jewish leaders, on the national level, in political life, the highest response indicating it was appropriate came from Jewish respondents: 59% of respondents considered it appropriate.
Rabbi Alon Goshen-Gottstein, executive director of the Elijah Interfaith Institute, said in a press release, “All facts point in the same direction. Jewish leadership seems to be suffering a crisis. When these facts are compared with some of the data relating to other religions, this might suggest one of the causes why Jews seek spiritual inspiration from teachers of other traditions.”

My scientist mind kicks in automatically when presented with these kinds of numbers and my first thought is: in how many different ways can the participants interpret the question re becoming more or less religious?
My suspicion is it might be easier to pretend to be just as religious as you were before for religions other than Judaism. Given the main thing Christianity for example requires is faith rather than action, you can easily trick yourself into thinking nothing’s changed when you look at your everyday life. Observant Judaism however requires concrete action so there’s no fooling yourself that you’ve stopped doing something.
I can’t speak for the other religions being discussed though, so this is pure conjecture.
By: Naomi on December 7, 2009
at 3:22 pm
That’s very interesting, Naomi.
It could be my Jewish bias, but wouldn’t a Christian also say: “I go to church every sunday, but I used to go tuesdays as well, so I guess I’m less religious”? I mean, even for them that could be a measure. But you’re right, if belief is the key…
Very interesting. This is definitely my bias: I like the arguably objective measure inherent in Judaism- but then you could argue doing more within a given commandment is not necessarily being more religious, either. I could be more strict and fool myself into thinking I’m more religious (and maybe, personally speaking, that was very true a few years ago), but I think there could be a case for quantity over “quality”, as quantity affects your habit and therefore your character traits. Not to be misunderstood regarding quality – as I once said, there’s a way to give flowers, and there’s a way not to give flowers.
By: mjss26 on December 8, 2009
at 2:16 pm
Yes you could be right about the going to church, although the only Christians I know who go more than once a week are Catholics who attend morning mass a couple of times a week (now I wonder where they got that idea from ;) ) I’m pretty sure your average protestant just goes once a week, maybe a Bible study class during the week or something. Certainly nothing like on the scale of physical, concrete observances that a traditional Jew would carry out each and every day.
Yes I totally see what you mean about the quantity/quality of actions. It would be interesting to see how Jews responded if the question about becoming more/less religious was made more concrete, adding detail about what they might mean by an increase or decrease. I’m fairly sure that different people will respond in vastly different ways depending on their own interpretation. But again, that’s just the scientist in me wanting things nailed down as concretely as possible!
By: Naomi on December 8, 2009
at 3:19 pm